publication

GUIDE on Auditing Scope 3: What Experts Look For in Your External Climate Actions

May 4, 2026

Table of contents

Carbon offsetting, contribution, insetting: under ESRS E1, every external climate investment is now subject to formal audit. Most sustainability teams discover the gap between what they declared and what they can actually prove during the audit, not before.

We mapped what auditors systematically look for, in the order they ask, and built from real CSRD audit observations.

The Omnibus I package, formally adopted on 24 February 2026, narrowed CSRD scope to companies with more than 1,000 employees and net turnover exceeding €450 million but left the core carbon credit disclosure requirements under ESRS E1-7 fully intact.

Why CSRD turned climate reporting into a forensic exercise

Until 2024, climate investments lived in voluntary reports. Nobody verified the claims.

Since ESRS came into force, an external auditor examines the evidence. Carbon credits must be reported separately under ESRS E1-7, with no netting against gross emissions. The CRCF regulation (in force since December 2024, with certification methodologies rolling out from 2026) introduces strict criteria on additionality and reversal risk. The Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition Directive (ECGT, applying from September 2026) restricts public claims like "carbon neutral" or "net zero" that rely on offsetting without substantiation.

Three regulations. One audit. A new profession sitting between you and your sustainability report: the auditor.

What happens when the evidence is missing

A growing list of companies acted in good faith and could not document what they had said publicly:

  • KLM (2024): Dutch court ruled that "Fly Responsibly" messaging was misleading because offsets created a false impression that flying could be sustainable. No penalty was imposed.
  • Apple "carbon neutral" Watch Series 9 launch (2023): European consumer organisations filed complaints arguing the claim could not be substantiated.
  • DWS / Deutsche Bank (2023): 25 million dollar settlement with the SEC over ESG misstatements. Documentation gaps, not bad intent.
  • Vattenfall (2022-2023): Finnish and Dutch regulators (the Consumer Ombudsman and ACM respectively) required Vattenfall to drop its "fossil-free living within one generation" advertising claims as unsubstantiated.

What the guide gives you

Built from real audit observations, the guide is a working document, not a thought piece. It is structured around the 5 questions auditors systematically ask about external climate actions, in the exact order they come up. For each question, you get:

  • The specific documents the auditor expects on the table
  • The wording traps that turn a defensible answer into a flag
  • A side-by-side reference for the two regimes (offsetting vs contribution) that look similar but lead to opposite legal exposures
  • A pre-audit checklist to run two weeks before your statutory auditor walks in.

Why Soil Capital wrote this

Soil Capital runs Europe's largest insetting and contribution programmes: 1,800 farmers, 500,000 hectares, 16 million euros paid to farmers for measured carbon outcomes. Our MRV is TÜV verified and ISO 14064-2 certified. We have sat next to sustainability teams during dozens of CSRD audits. This guide is the playbook we wish every team had before their first review.

Take a step towards us

Register to the event

Download the Guide

First Name*
Last Name*
Company Name*
Email*
Phone number
Thank you!
Access to the content now :
Download nowTélécharger maintenant
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Table of contents

Carbon offsetting, contribution, insetting: under ESRS E1, every external climate investment is now subject to formal audit. Most sustainability teams discover the gap between what they declared and what they can actually prove during the audit, not before.

We mapped what auditors systematically look for, in the order they ask, and built from real CSRD audit observations.

The Omnibus I package, formally adopted on 24 February 2026, narrowed CSRD scope to companies with more than 1,000 employees and net turnover exceeding €450 million but left the core carbon credit disclosure requirements under ESRS E1-7 fully intact.

Why CSRD turned climate reporting into a forensic exercise

Until 2024, climate investments lived in voluntary reports. Nobody verified the claims.

Since ESRS came into force, an external auditor examines the evidence. Carbon credits must be reported separately under ESRS E1-7, with no netting against gross emissions. The CRCF regulation (in force since December 2024, with certification methodologies rolling out from 2026) introduces strict criteria on additionality and reversal risk. The Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition Directive (ECGT, applying from September 2026) restricts public claims like "carbon neutral" or "net zero" that rely on offsetting without substantiation.

Three regulations. One audit. A new profession sitting between you and your sustainability report: the auditor.

What happens when the evidence is missing

A growing list of companies acted in good faith and could not document what they had said publicly:

  • KLM (2024): Dutch court ruled that "Fly Responsibly" messaging was misleading because offsets created a false impression that flying could be sustainable. No penalty was imposed.
  • Apple "carbon neutral" Watch Series 9 launch (2023): European consumer organisations filed complaints arguing the claim could not be substantiated.
  • DWS / Deutsche Bank (2023): 25 million dollar settlement with the SEC over ESG misstatements. Documentation gaps, not bad intent.
  • Vattenfall (2022-2023): Finnish and Dutch regulators (the Consumer Ombudsman and ACM respectively) required Vattenfall to drop its "fossil-free living within one generation" advertising claims as unsubstantiated.

What the guide gives you

Built from real audit observations, the guide is a working document, not a thought piece. It is structured around the 5 questions auditors systematically ask about external climate actions, in the exact order they come up. For each question, you get:

  • The specific documents the auditor expects on the table
  • The wording traps that turn a defensible answer into a flag
  • A side-by-side reference for the two regimes (offsetting vs contribution) that look similar but lead to opposite legal exposures
  • A pre-audit checklist to run two weeks before your statutory auditor walks in.

Why Soil Capital wrote this

Soil Capital runs Europe's largest insetting and contribution programmes: 1,800 farmers, 500,000 hectares, 16 million euros paid to farmers for measured carbon outcomes. Our MRV is TÜV verified and ISO 14064-2 certified. We have sat next to sustainability teams during dozens of CSRD audits. This guide is the playbook we wish every team had before their first review.

Ready to future-proof your climate and regen ag strategy?
Get in touch with our team

Take a step towards us

Register to the event

Download the Guide

Thank you!
Access to the content now :
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
black cross